#18600: Fix several methods for sparse polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  bruno              |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  commutative        |   Resolution:
  algebra                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  sparse polynomial  |    Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix
        Authors:  Bruno Grenet       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/18600       |  e021276b5e043e066842b4e6e3644d489626deab
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:19 bruno]:
 > Replying to [comment:16 vdelecroix]:
 > > - why are you keeping a method `newton_slopes` in both
 `polynomial_element.Polynomial` and
 `polynomial_element_generic.Polynomial_generic_sparse`? The algorithm does
 not seem to use much about the sparse structure. Moreover, why their
 arguments differ?
 >
 > The rationale is that for very sparse polynomials, one may want to get
 the newton slopes in a "compressed" format, that is as a list of segments
 defined by their slope and length rather than as a (very long) list of
 length-1 segments solely defined by their slope. I decided to implement
 this "compressed" output for sparse polynomials only since this feature
 seem(ed) mostly useful for sparse polynomials.
 >
 > A modification I could do is to move my implementation in the
 `Polynomial` class. Do yo think it would be the right thing to do?

 I understand the need of the argument. But if it also makes sense at the
 level of `Polynomial` then yes, do it there. That way there will only be
 one implementation and one signature.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18600#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to