#15875: Add is_subposet
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  csar               |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  posets             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/is_subposet           |  c3b48f366eb7a82519338fb390d9363ce6c68180
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Hey nonononnoo why would you convert everything to facade? These non-
 facade posets are not something I would ever want to work with, but the
 reason for them is that these people want the elements to BELONG to this
 specific poset, and to be different from anything that does not belong to
 the same poset.

 This may be a stupid idea but you should not go against it in this
 specific function. Either they are removed or they stay, but their
 specifications should be respected.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15875#comment:45>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to