#6870: [with second patch, needs review] Bug in binomial
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hgranath          |       Owner:  somebody  
     Type:  defect            |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  minor             |   Milestone:  sage-4.1.2
Component:  basic arithmetic  |    Keywords:  binomial  
 Reviewer:                    |      Author:            
   Merged:                    |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Comment(by hgranath):

 I think to some extent this is a correctness vs speed issue. Before
 the patch there is an asymmetry in the checking of whether m and x-m
 is in ZZ. So e.g. binomial(3/2,1/2) works while binomial(3/2,1/1)
 fails, although the documentation indicates they should be equivalent.
 For me it was very confusing when something like that happened.
 The benchmark case binomial(n+1,n) benefits from this asymmetry. I
 have thought about it, but so far I have not found a satisfactory
 solution which will not affect the speed of binomial(n+1,n) while
 doing the right thing in other cases.

 The other thing my patch is doing is to check more carefully if x is
 an integer. As noted this will be an improvement when this succeeds.
 Apart from the above benchmarks, try e.g. binomial(QQ(10**7),252525) or
 binomial(SR(10**7),252525) with and without the patch applied. This
 part of the patch however is not as important to me, a user could
 always use binomial(ZZ(x),m) when beneficial. Hence an alternative
 patch is to just do the first part. This will decrease the speed
 regression in the symbolic case.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6870#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to