#6452: Codes over rings
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  wdj    |        Owner:  rlm
           Type:         |       Status:  needs_work
  enhancement            |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
       Priority:  major  |   Resolution:
      Component:         |    Merged in:
  coding theory          |    Reviewers:
       Keywords:         |  Work issues:
        Authors:         |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |  1177056cb4942b0ce938a30537357bcb07f1bf19
         Branch:         |     Stopgaps:
  public/6452            |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 All right, I will try to do something. I had a more careful look at the
 code (and the corresponding master thesis) but I was not able to
 understand anything. With the Smith form it will also be straightforward
 to implement a (possibly very efficient) iterator over the elements of the
 module.

 One non trivial point is to decide equality of sub-modules. The only
 canonical part of the Smith form is the diagonal matrix (which only gives
 you a hint about isomorphisms between submodules). But I guess that we can
 somehow echelonize the part corresponding to a given ideal. I would be
 much more happy with a clean reference...

 Since this is more about submodules of `(ZZ/nZZ)^r` I am not sure it
 should go at all inside `sage.codings`. I would rather put it in
 `sage.modules`. And (as I already told you), it would be better to
 factorize more between `sage.modules` and `sage.codings` when the code is
 '''only''' given by a generator matrix. So, for the sake of this ticket,
 my concrete proposal is:
  - implement submodules of `(ZZ/nZZ)^r` with a canonical form
  - have an efficient iterator
 If you think it is not too far from the original purpose of this ticket, I
 will modify the ticket description accordingly.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6452#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to