#6452: Codes over rings
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: wdj | Owner: rlm
Type: | Status: needs_work
enhancement | Milestone: sage-6.9
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: | Merged in:
coding theory | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 1177056cb4942b0ce938a30537357bcb07f1bf19
Branch: | Stopgaps:
public/6452 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:23 jsrn]:
> Replying to [comment:22 vdelecroix]:
> A different matter: the current patch is Cython. Do we want that? I
remember Jeroen's advice to always try Cython only after you have
determined that you really need the performance, and that Cython will give
this to you.
Most of it will be in Python. Only the iterator can possibly be in Cython
and it should not be more than 20 lines of code. But it makes sense to do
it in a second time.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/6452#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
