#19353: A (729, 448, 277, 272)-strongly regular graph
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  positive_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:  graph  |    Reviewers:
  theory                 |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  d5f10f7e308bf0fdbe9cfd2b7cc39eab6ace8eb4
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/19353         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #19335                 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:3 ncohen]:
 > > OK, the last, I hope. How about (729  336  153  156 ), though? Sage
 says
 > > `...Penttila & Royle: projective 9-ary [42,3] code with weights 36,
 39`
 >
 > Isn't that #19311?

 isn't #19311 about something different -- two-intersection code(s)?

 >
 > > I'm about to start complaining that all these 2-weight codes should go
 to where they belong to, and we just get them from `sage.codes.whatever`.
 >
 > And you would be right to. It takes a lifetime to compile this cython
 module, and most of it has no reason to be cython code. Would you feel
 like writing this two-code module in sage.coding? It is clear that it
 belongs there, but given that I still do not totally understand all the
 meaning of all parameters in a "projective 9-ary [42,3] code with weights
 36, 39", I do not feel much at ease implementing and documenting all
 that...


 I recall having a long tread, either in email, or in some google groups,
 or on trac, where I explained (to myself mostly) the stuff on projective
 codes. I can't seem to locate it. Did I just dream about it? Or  perhaps
 you know where to find this?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19353#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to