#19353: A (729, 448, 277, 272)-strongly regular graph
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | d5f10f7e308bf0fdbe9cfd2b7cc39eab6ace8eb4
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/19353 |
Dependencies: |
#19335 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:5 ncohen]:
> > isn't #19311 about something different -- two-intersection code(s)?
>
> It's up to you. I read somewhere that two-intersection codes were
equivalent to two-weight codes.
>
> I do not mind much myself, as long as the graph is generated.
OK, so if we knew this transformation, then no need for a new way to build
graphs would be needed, right?
>
> > I recall having a long tread, either in email, or in some google
groups, or on trac, where I explained (to myself mostly) the stuff on
projective codes. I can't seem to locate it. Did I just dream about it? Or
perhaps you know where to find this?
>
> HMmmmmmm... It does not ring a bell.. Can't tell, sorry.
ah, it's on #18960. Good. (I checked my mailboxes, google groups, but not
trac ;-))
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19353#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
