#19141: Poset documentation polishing: Boolean-valued properties
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: poset | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_documentation_polishing__boolean_valued_properties|
d99ab5f27d400709e8108c41e3eb62623ac4f83a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kdilks):
I think that sounds like a good idea. It might require additional coding
in some cases, since the best algorithm for determining true/false may not
always involve finding such a certificate.
Would we want to have separate functions for returning just a boolean
versus possibly returning a certificate like in that graph example, or
would we just want to add an optional parameter {{{certificate}}} to the
existing function?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19141#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.