#19368: Add LL() method for polyhedral closed convex cones.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mjo                |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  geometry           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Michael Orlitzky   |    Reviewers:  Andrey Novoseltsev
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:  clarify trivial cone
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/mjo/ticket/19368                 |  8bda4c2134f5e6460c6ce9bae5e0ba96679e54c3
   Dependencies:  #19332             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by mjo):

 * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:5 novoselt]:
 > Your use of the term "trivial cone" is confusing - after reading the
 very first example I thought "Surely any transformation is Lyapunov-like
 since there is no conditions to worry about!", yet their basis was empty.
 To me "trivial cone" means "consisting of the origin"...

 You are correct -- the important part of that doctest was that the space
 is trivial. It's been updated, and I added an example of a trivial cone
 (only the origin) in a non-trivial space.

 [[BR]]

 > Are these matrices expected to be non-integer? I.e. why base_field and
 not base_ring?

 The tensor products are integer matrices, but when we convert to long
 vectors, I think a field is required. I assume the `complement()`
 algorithm needs a field anyway, and the matrices that pop out can be
 rational:

 {{{
 sage: K = Cone([(-5, -1, 0), (53, -2, 1), (-1, -1, 6)])
 sage: K.lyapunov_like_basis()
 [
 [1 0 0]  [       0        1        0]  [        0         0         1]
 [0 1 0]  [ 44/4505 681/4505 -126/901]  [  -15/901    75/901   911/901]
 [0 0 1], [ -15/901   75/901  911/901], [   87/901  -435/901 -5464/901]
 ]
 }}}

 I could normalize those after the fact?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19368#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to