#18376: New encoding structure for linear codes
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
dlucas | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
coding theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: David | ed67ee233a40eefc5ce785596cdb83a6d0e62c63
Lucas | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/dlucas/encoder |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dlucas):
> Why is `LinearCodeGeneratorMatrixEncoder` registered on
`AbstractLinearCode` and not `LinearCode`?
My mistake; fixed.
>` encoder.py`: instanciated -> instantiated
Fixed.
> `codes.encoders` now contains `lazy_import`. Should be hidden
Done.
> `AbstractLinearCode` class doc warning: perhaps "and `F` its base ring"
should be "and `F` is the base field of the code".
Yes, it's less confusing like that. Done.
> `encoder.encode` doc: the newly added "`encode` is a partial function
..." should perhaps be made slightly less strong to not confuse readers:
"`encode` might be a partial function ...". Many encoders are going to be
complete.
That's right. Changed it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18376#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
