#19463: A coding/two_weight_db module
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
coding theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 6c8ea206c058bf7fb92523abee99d8d3fa91b332
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/19463 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> in [BJ03], you get name wrong
Fixed.
> Isn't there a simpler way of getting the set of weights than
I now call `LinearCode.weight_distribution`.
> One possibility: hard code the values + add a (long) doctest that checks
that these values are indeed correct?
That was done in an early version of this patch. I removed it to not see
data repeated. I guess that it cannot hurt... All this code may eventually
be wiped out however, if we start adding generic code constructions
instead of fixed-size examples. That will probably change all the design,
but well. We'll see.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19463#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
