#19463: A coding/two_weight_db module
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
coding theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 73930f28c0d15ac1cbe1b6fd2741817608dec0ec
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/19463 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jsrn):
I wrote it as a "random idea". I am somewhat motivated to do it myself,
but realistically, I might well not find time to do it. I have no
objections to your code if no one else wants to implement my suggestion.
It was also a comment to Vincent's suggestion. Something like: what he
suggests opens up a few questions IMHO, and to properly cater all that,
one needs a more invasive restructuring of your code. In that sense it was
a defence of your code as it's currently written.
Johan
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19463#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
