#19473: FiniteDimensionalAlgebra.is_unitary is not sufficient
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: finite- | Merged in:
dimensional algebra, linear | Reviewers:
algebra | Work issues: check that it works
Authors: Darij Grinberg | (my sage is still compiling); test
Report Upstream: N/A | for speed regressions
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/19473 | 376152ea6bd6616b9b47b184b5e4c508c4850f86
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
OK, feel free to rollback my 2nd commit, which as I see just now is broken
anyway. I'm all for immutability, though I am not sure if we want
`UniqueRepresentation` (didn't we agree at some point that it is a pain in
the ass?).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19473#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
