#19490: adding the q-Bernoulli polynomials
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
chapoton | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
q-analogue | 6752cf18c9e4e0f70c041ecf971d17009915a4ed
Authors: | Stopgaps:
Frédéric Chapoton |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/chapoton/19490 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* reviewer: => Travis Scrimshaw
Comment:
Thanks for implementing this. A few things:
- Is there a reason why you changed it to use `polygen`? IMO, the version
that is currently there is more explicit (and [slightly] faster because
`polygen` does that plus some extra checks). By not using `polygen`, I
think this also makes the creation of the polynomial ring in `x` over
`ZZ['q']` easier to understand.
- Python's convention for error messages are "to be formatted as phrases"
without periods.
- Can you expand your explanation about this comment?
{{{
This function returns a slight modification of the original
Carlitz `q`-Bernoulli polynomials.
}}}
- I think we should allow input to override `q` and `x` similar to what
the `q_binomial` does.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19490#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
