#19490: adding the q-Bernoulli polynomials
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
chapoton | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.10
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
q-analogue | 284efb7752c8a71ca6800c0b268b50d0d754896f
Authors: | Stopgaps:
Frédéric Chapoton |
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/chapoton/19490 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by chapoton):
I have taken care of your first 3 points.
Concerning the last one, I am very reluctant (and was already for
`q_bernoulli`).
IMO anybody wanting to specialise x or q to something can just as well
compute the polynomial and then specialise it.
To be coherent with `bernoulli_polynomial`, one would also have to put x
in the first place among the arguments, and that forces x to be a
mandatory argument, which I find very bad.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19490#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
