#19503: strip TESTS blocks in introspection
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: John Palmieri | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jhpalmieri/TESTS | c659e025d483d55b4bf644fa2f367884c7a2ca20
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:25 jhpalmieri]:
> So I guess the question is whether to hide too much now, or to live with
the situation where we don't hide anything. (I don't think we will find
anyone willing to examine and evaluate each possibly omitted block, which
would be the best choice.)
Then can this be made at least optional? I.e. have an environment variable
or something, defaults to `True`, that controls if `TESTS` are shown with
`?`? Just what is suggested to html-docs.
Sage will always be unfinished product. That it true for documentation
also.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19503#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
