#19517: Graphs: canonical_label() and return_graph -parameter
--------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo    |        Owner:
           Type:  defect        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major         |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  graph theory  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                |    Merged in:
        Authors:                |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A           |  Work issues:
         Branch:                |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                |     Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+-------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > There is something strange with `bliss` installation, see
 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/_1OYNuVNltM

 Something like that happened during the last update of bliss, but Jeroen
 noticed it at the last minute:
 http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19483#comment:15

 > `return_graph` is not converse of `inplace`. I guess. It is badly
 documented. What is the meaning of it's output?

 (assuming that you are talking of 'canonical_label')

 `return_graph` tells whether or not you want the actual graph. Somethimes
 you only need the labelling, and not the whole graph.


  A list of pairs somehow... Try
 >
 > {{{
 > G = graphs.PetersenGraph()
 > G.relabel(lambda x: chr(ord('a')+x))
 > G.canonical_label(return_graph=False)
 > }}}

 These pairs are the edges of the relabeled graph
 {{{
 sage: Graph(G.canonical_label(return_graph=False)) ==
 graphs.PetersenGraph().canonical_label()
 True
 }}}

 Can't say that I see the point to return this instead of a `Graph`
 object...

 > And why it deletes vertex positioning contraty to `relabel`? Try for
 example

 Probably because the graph is built from the list of edges, instead of
 being built as a relabelled copy of the original graph. Why do you ask
 these questions like there is a mystical explanation behind? It's a bug,
 that's all. It just needs to be fixed.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19517#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to