#19584: Clean up NTL comparisons
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: cython | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/19584 | ff349f5363d23529a5765e8038ac75b7dd0982ea
Dependencies: #19579 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:7 jpflori]:
> This looks good to me.
>
> More generally on NTL: do we really need all this "thin" wrappers which
do not seem to be used anywhere in Sage?
I'm not sure if they are all used, but some are certainly used.
But really, we have thin wrappers for libGAP objects, for PARI objects,
... so why not NTL?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19584#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
