#19585: Improve efficiency of calling GAP functions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jaanos             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  interfaces         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  GAP functions      |    Merged in:
  interface                          |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
        Authors:  Janoš Vidali       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  31a173bccd732cb8d8b656d6882dcec074a87b7d
  u/jaanos/improve_calling_gap_function-19585|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jaanos):

 I agree with the change.

 By the way, earlier in `Expect.__init__`, `_get_using_file` is set if the
 ''value'' is too long - I don't see how that helps (except when `is_name
 == True`, but the new code also covers this case). So we can probably
 remove that piece of code, too.

 On the other hand, this comment
 {{{
 #!python
 # idea: Joe Wetherell -- try to find out if the output
 # is too long and if so get it using file, otherwise
 # don't.
 }}}
 makes me wonder whether `_get_using_file == True` was meant that fetching
 the result would be done using a temporary file (rather than using one to
 communicate the variable name). But of course, a long command may give a
 very short answer, and the output of a short command may be very long, so
 this isn't something that can be decided here. Also, the only
 `get_using_file` methods apart from the new one in `gap.py` are the
 generic one in `interface.py` (which simply calls `get`), and one in
 `lie.py` which raises a `NotImplementedError`. So we're probably safe
 redefining the meaning, if that's what's happening here.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19585#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to