#19643: BRiAl not building on cygwin
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gouezel | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: porting: Cygwin | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Sebastien Gouezel | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/gouezel/brial_cygwin | bc3110294fd1f9c4842278c49a9c6ddbd93a487f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by gouezel):
* cc: ohanar (added)
Comment:
I did not report it upstream because the status of upstream is not clear:
https://github.com/BRiAl/BRiAl only mentions polybori, and polybori
maintainers. Let me cc ohanar, as he created the brial ticket in #18437.
Sure, adding -no-undefined only on cygwin would be better, but I do not
see how it could hurt in any case.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19643#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
