#19686: Category of posets: lower_set() broken
---------------------------------+-------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo     |        Owner:
           Type:  defect         |       Status:  new
       Priority:  minor          |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  combinatorics  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  poset          |    Merged in:
        Authors:                 |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A            |  Work issues:
         Branch:                 |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                 |     Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+-------------------------

Old description:

> {{{
> P = Posets.PentagonPoset()
> print P.principal_order_ideal(3)
> print P.principal_lower_set(3)
> print P.order_ideal([3])
> print P.lower_set([3])
> }}}
>
> gives
>
> {{{
> [0, 2, 3]
> [0, 2, 3]
> [0, 2, 3]
> TypeError: 'NotImplementedType' object is not callable
> }}}
>
> And this seems like a bug. CC to nthiery as this probably relates to
> category code.

New description:

 {{{
 P = Posets.PentagonPoset()
 print P.principal_order_ideal(3)
 print P.principal_lower_set(3)
 print P.order_ideal([3])
 print P.lower_set([3])
 }}}

 gives

 {{{
 [0, 2, 3]
 [0, 2, 3]
 [0, 2, 3]
 TypeError: 'NotImplementedType' object is not callable
 }}}

 And this seems like a bug. Same applies to `upper_set`.

--

Comment (by jmantysalo):

 Replying to [comment:1 nthiery]:

 > By the way: the rationale for those aliases is that, in the long run, I
 am in favor of migrating from `order_ideal` to `lower_set`: the former is
 ambiguous with two distinct widely accepted meanings in the community.

 I never remember which one is "ideal" and which "filter". Hence "lower
 (/upper) set" is better. OTOH the order ideals lattice of a poset is
 established term.

 > Note: this is about (the abstract classes for) posets ; not to the
 category infrastructure.

 Yep. But you may know what to do with `@abstract_method` that seems to be
 the difference between `lower_set` and `principal_lower_set`. I do not.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19686#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to