#19686: Category of posets: lower_set() broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.11
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: poset | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/category_of_posets__lower_set___broken|
6297f4a313e4214ae1d7b1dcd44a3a9bbb7c2d60
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: new => needs_review
* commit: => 6297f4a313e4214ae1d7b1dcd44a3a9bbb7c2d60
* milestone: sage-6.10 => sage-6.11
Comment:
What you think about this? At least now `lower_set` and `upper_set` seems
to work.
There is also `is_order_filter` (and `...ideal`). They should be changed
too, if we make `[lower|upper]_set()` the preferred name.
I would like to see html docs with functions like this hidden. Just like
we now have deprecated function removed, we should have a way to hide non-
preferred alias names.
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=6297f4a313e4214ae1d7b1dcd44a3a9bbb7c2d60
6297f4a]||{{{Fix [lower|upper]_set() in poset category.}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19686#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
