#19831: Add random_element() for cones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mjo                |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.0
      Component:  geometry           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Michael Orlitzky   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/mjo/ticket/19831                 |  c2ff0460b15f2d4175be60fc34c706408d90e8a0
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by novoselt):

 Replying to [comment:4 mjo]:
 > Replying to [comment:2 novoselt]:
 > > Or there could be an optional parameter for this, defaulting to all
 integral weights?
 >
 > This would be no problem, but how should the return type work? If we use
 integral weights we could return a lattice element but with any other
 field it would have to be a vector.

 I definitely would like to get an appropriate lattice element for
 (default) integral weights and with anything else a vector is fine, that's
 consistent with other places that attempt to work with lattices but fall
 back to generic vectors/modules when this is not possible/implemented.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19831#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to