#19890: Improve standardization
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Priez | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | b248fb55c423ffc380700234be22fa7a37ace3c2
u/elixyre/standardization | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by elixyre):
Replying to [comment:2 tscrim]:
> That is quite the improvement. Here are some comments and suggestions:
>
> - Why do you import `imap`? You don't seem to use it.
Sorry, it is a mistake... I was to fast and I forgot to remove that.
> - Are you going to delete the old algorithm or keep it and add an
`algorithm` option? I would at least keep the old (naive) algorithm around
in a doctest for testing.
I deleted the old below and I had it in doctest!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19890#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
