#19659: Poset: inverse function of ordinal_sum()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.0
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  poset              |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/develop               |  4358a5a4574999015ccb9088bdb842dcc738d40c
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > But the question remains: What is the meaning of `hasse_diagram.py`?
 Whole poset class could be implemented with just a digraph as one member
 variable. But then I guess we would have more internal functions starting
 with `_`. Or more functions returning something actually only useful for
 internal use.

 What we have now is Poset.X *and* HassDiagram.X.

 > An example: check (broken!) parameter `partial` at `maximal_chains`. It
 is needed for `order_complex`. I think that the whole concept of "partial
 maximal chain" is odd and should be removed. It could have placed in
 `hasse_diagrams.py`, which is meant for internal implementation. (Btw, see
 #18944 - my suggestion to drop `partial`-option was rejected.)

 The combinat guys have ther own view of the code. Perhaps something like
 "whatever should be useful to one must be a public method". In the case of
 very very specific functions, sometimes hard to document properly, I do
 not believe that it is a good choice.

 > I think that I can generate something like all posets of size 7 in the
 same time as all Hasse diagrams of size 8. So it really loses some cpu
 time to make posets.

 I am tired to find ways to not call the constructor because it does things
 you never asked it to do.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19659#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to