#19623: Syndrome decoder is not a syndrome decoder
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dlucas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: David Lucas | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dlucas/generic_decoders | fc79446d6948143d32a9065410453379c79ef2b2
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jsrn):
Quick remark
- Since the covering radius of a linear code is always at most `n-k`, does
it
make any sense to let the table search beyond that?
- Did you prove that if there are no coset leaders of weight `t`, then
there are no coset leaders of `t+1`? (i.e. that your early termination is
sound)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19623#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
