#19889: improve coding style and documentation style in affine schemes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: bhutz | Owner: rlmiller
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Ben Hutz
Authors: Rebecca Miller | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 60eea2dcac360a0229fdcd6d513ce9c3989ec706
u/rlmiller/ticket/19889 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by bhutz):
I assume you meant to set this to needs review. The docs build now and I
was able to look at them. It looks like some of your line wrapping for
INPUT/OUTPUT is not formatting correctly. It is because of the number of
spaces indenting the 2nd line. For example look at the input/output of
dynatomic_polynomial in affine_morphism. The output formats correctly, but
the input does not.
There are a number of such spacing issues in the files.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19889#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
