#20012: Really deprecate CFF/ContinuedFractionField
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/deprecate_cff_continuedfractionfield|
7f201e65fd908d337baef16cf7590f06ac323a84
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:5 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:4 vdelecroix]:
> > Couldn't we deprecate more?
>
> That doesn't work because of #19628. The current branch gives a
deprecation warning whenever an element of `CFF` is constructed. I think
this is sufficient: you cannot really do anything useful with `CFF`
without creating elements.
Agreed. I just want to avoid people complaining about deletion because it
was not deprecated...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20012#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
