#20078: Minimal non faces of simplicial complexes: Improve speed
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jipilab | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
topology | Merged in:
Keywords: simplicial | Reviewers:
complex, minimal nonface | Work issues:
Authors: Jean-Philippe | Commit:
Labbé | a26ad0bfff0273656cebb060691056dd75fc2f7b
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/jipilab/minnonface |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by stumpc5):
Replying to [comment:13 tscrim]:
> - I would use `itertools` instead `Subsets`:
> - In general, I would try to avoid using Sage's `Set` at much as
possible (which we should cythonize). Instead, I would use python's
(`frozen`)`set`s. This way we avoid the overhead.
I was just thinking the same thing (and trying to play with it) -- beside
that, this is a brute force implementation, but hopefully good enough
until someone hits its limits :-)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20078#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
