#10819: implementation of the cluster complex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: cluster complex | Merged in:
Authors: Christian Stump | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/10819 | 9f6fe10c2c998385a5d21830deea3c62c99e24e4
Dependencies: #20111 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
I think this is the best way to do things (at least because their
implementation was simple).
Coxeter groups don't necessarily have all of the methods that Weyl groups
have (since they are not tied to a particular root lattice). You should be
able to use `W.reflections()[beta]` from #20027, and it ''should'' work as
well for Weyl groups now that the behavior is consistent.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10819#comment:45>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
