#20086: ZZ[X], QQ[X]: allow arbitrary powers of constant polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  cheuberg           |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.1
      Component:  basic arithmetic   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Clemens Heuberger  |    Reviewers:  Benjamin Hackl
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/cheuberg/polynomials/power       |  14f7efaaf5be81405d1954473b4dc3f47100e486
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by cheuberg):

 * status:  needs_info => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:16 vdelecroix]:
 > Why doing something that complicated for dealing with strange exponents?
 Why not simply
 > {{{
 > if input is not an integer:
 >   convert to an integer
 > do the exponentiation
 > }}}

 I do not understand this comment. Which input? Base or Exponent? Where
 should this code be?


 >
 > Why are you special casing degree 0 polynomial? If I understand
 correctly these examples won't behave similarly
 > {{{
 > sage: R.<x> = QQ[]
 > sage: ((x+1)^2)^(1/2)
 > -> TypeError
 > sage: ((R(2))^2)^(1/2)
 > -> 2
 > }}}
 > Which is weird.

 I need a quick fix for `R(1)^(1/2)`. If somebody has time to implement
 `((x+1)^2)^(1/2)` very soon, I'd be happy. I do not have time soon.
 However, I want to have the code associated with a recently submitted
 paper in 7.1.

 Basically, this fix here simply branches to existing code. Computing
 `((x+1)^2)^(1/2)` needs new mathematical code (involving square free
 decomposition).

 Therefore, I propose to include this now on the basis that while this is
 not a perfect and definitive solution, it is better than the previous
 behaviour.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20086#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to