#17030: Knot Theory as a part of GSoC 2014.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  amitjamadagni      |        Owner:  amitjamadagni
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.2
      Component:  algebraic          |   Resolution:
  topology                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:  Miguel Marco, Karl-
        Authors:  Amit Jamadagni,    |  Dieter Crisman, Frédéric Chapoton,
  Miguel Marco                       |  Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/17030                |  075d7b74a5e4c1026f06c9f03f63c993e646e5d4
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by fuglede):

 The determinant should definitely be 1; it's the Seifert matrix that
 doesn't really make sense to me (because as mentioned above, for the case
 of interest, one Seifert surface is the cylinder, but again, I have not
 understood what the algorithm actually does).

 By treating only the symptoms, the algorithm now (in 7711771b) produces
 the incorrect result for the unknot:

 {{{
 sage: B = BraidGroup(2)
 sage: b = B([1])
 sage: b.alexander_polynomial()
 1
 sage: Link(b).alexander_polynomial()
 0
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17030#comment:167>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to