#7112: [with patch; needs work] os x 10.5 powerpc -- there are many many doctest
failures all over
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.1.2
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I hate to tell you this...
For some reason on PPC X.4, I actually got a different answer, forget the
sorting, on the item in part2. I don't know why, but '5' did not show up
in the list. Indeed, it must not have Same running the commands
separately. Even more aggravating, doctests pass now BUT if I do it "by
hand", I still don't get 5, no matter what I do. And it looks like that
must be the case on your X.5 PPC as well, since you removed the five in
the first patch.
But on Macintel X.5, I get the 5, as I also do on sagenb.org. So I assume
that the '5' is right, BUT the answer is definitely different on PPC.
What now? Is there a way to mark this test as being dependent? Or should
there be a ... in the test? Or is there a bug in the code for
integral_elements_in_box?
On the plus side, everything else is great!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7112#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
