#7112: [with patch; needs review] os x 10.5 powerpc -- there are many many
doctest
failures all over
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-4.1.2
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Author:
Reviewer: | Merged:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by GeorgSWeber):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
From just reading the patch(es), this is a positive review. The
{{{
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/totallyreal_rel.py
}}}
will still fail however, there is a deeper problem lurking in that one
point of a certain lattice sitting in a certain rectangle is missed in the
computations on a PPC platform --- but that would be another ticket. Let
the doctest fail for the time being, the enhancements by the patch(es) for
this ticket here are needed anyway, I guess.
All I need is to really test the whole patch(es) on my PPC, but #7186 was
holding me up (the very first file, calculus.py, did show a very nasty
doctest output ...), so I have to postpone this for yet another day (i.e.
night, sigh ...).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7112#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
