#18888: failing optional mathematica tests, due to bugs in N() and n()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: slabbe | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: interfaces: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: mathematica | Reviewers: Matthias Koeppe
Authors: | Work issues: add () in `n()`
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/18888 | 53e76e679a7c411aa4f193dabca0d8281fdaf052
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by dimpase):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* work_issues: fix `N()` and `n()` => add () in `n()`
Comment:
> Does it make sense to implement mathematica('Pi').n(digits=10) as well?
oops, right, there is a typo in n() implementation. I'll fix it at once.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18888#comment:44>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
