#19538: Fix LaurentPolynomialRing coercion issues
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  etn40ff                |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
  defect                 |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  algebra                |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  76ac4339b195762106d406516400f8468de844ef
  Salvatore Stella       |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/etn40ff/19358        |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Unless I did a mistake, the conversion rules are the same for
 `PolynomialRing` and `LaurentPolynomialRing` (but the semantic of the
 operation `in` is not as you noticed). The rules are as follows for a map
 `R -> S`:
  1. if the variables of `R` are included in the variables of `S` then the
 map `R -> S` is given by names of variables
  2. else if `R` has less or equal variables than `S`  then the map `R ->
 S` is given by the order of the variable
  3. else if some variable of `R` are present in `S` then there is a
 partial map considered
  4. otherwise an error is raised
 {{{
 sage: R1 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x,y')
 sage: R2 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x,t')
 sage: R3 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 't,x')
 sage: R4 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x,t,y')
 sage: map(R4, R1.gens()) # rule 1
 [x, y]
 sage: map(R4, R3.gens()) # rule 1
 [t, x]
 sage: map(R2, R1.gens())  # rule 2
 [x, t]
 sage: map(R1, R2.gens())  # rule 2
 [x, y]
 sage: R1(R4('y')) # rule 3
 y
 sage: R1(R4('t')) # rule 4
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 ...
 TypeError: Could not find a mapping of the passed element to this ring.
 }}}
 These rules should not change. You can have a look at the implementation
 of `_element_constructor_` for polynomial rings.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19538#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to