#20323: Common TestSuite for MIP backends
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mkoeppe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: lp | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mkoeppe/common_testsuite_for_mip_backends|
f5f69bd5500538071542b3f85d53771c476b10cc
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mkoeppe):
Thanks for taking a look, Travis.
Replying to [comment:4 tscrim]:
> Also, is there a reason why `GenericBackend` needs to inherit from
`SageObject` (as opposed to just the Python `object`)?
`SageObject` provides some of the basic testing infrastructure, such as
`._test_not_implemented_methods`.
Well, there's also `sage.misc.sage_unittest.PythonObjectWithTests`, but I
can't seem to `cimport` it to make it a base class of `GenericBackend`. So
I guess I'll stick with `SageObject`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20323#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
