#14840: SageNB package contains many packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  felixs             |        Owner:  felixs
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-7.2
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  standard                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  notebook, days77   |    Reviewers:  Salvatore Stella
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  Reported           |       Commit:
  upstream. No feedback yet.         |  161ac3ba998689b9a3a3435ed85e4316cd61fb77
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/jdemeyer/ticket/14840            |
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > > well, the upstream lives on github. I suggest we merge the
 corresponding pull requests there, before creating a release, so that the
 tarball does come from the "official" repo.
 >
 > If kcrisman merges just this one pull request and nothing else, then my
 tarball and the "official" will have exactly the same sources (they might
 even be the same git commit if a fast-forward merge is done), so they are
 effectively indistinguishable.

 Yeah, as long as I don't have to create an extra merge commit (which is
 not possible on GH but should be possible command line, as you say) then
 that is fine.

 In fact, without the weird packaging thing, the "official" tarball would
 indeed be the ones on Github now; the reason they aren't currently is
 because of the subpackage stuff, I believe.  I'm only concerned about the
 repos looking the same, not where some "official" package lives.

 I'm sorry I can't do anything "officially" on GH now regarding this (I
 mean merging, because then I feel responsible and have to do testing
 etc.).  But this solution is fine with me, and I am one of the few people
 who cares about this, so no worries.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14840#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to