#14840: SageNB package contains many packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: felixs | Owner: felixs
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: notebook, days77 | Reviewers: Salvatore Stella
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. No feedback yet. | 161ac3ba998689b9a3a3435ed85e4316cd61fb77
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/14840 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:55 kcrisman]:
> > > well, the upstream lives on github. I suggest we merge the
corresponding pull requests there, before creating a release, so that the
tarball does come from the "official" repo.
> >
> > If kcrisman merges just this one pull request and nothing else, then
my tarball and the "official" will have exactly the same sources (they
might even be the same git commit if a fast-forward merge is done), so
they are effectively indistinguishable.
>
> Yeah, as long as I don't have to create an extra merge commit (which is
not possible on GH
why? did you look at the link I posted?
https://help.github.com/articles/about-pull-request-merge-squashing/
> but should be possible command line, as you say) then that is fine.
>
> In fact, without the weird packaging thing, the "official" tarball would
indeed be the ones on Github now; the reason they aren't currently is
because of the subpackage stuff, I believe. I'm only concerned about the
repos looking the same, not where some "official" package lives.
>
> I'm sorry I can't do anything "officially" on GH now regarding this (I
mean merging, because then I feel responsible and have to do testing
etc.).
I presume one just has to look that it builds and runs. It's merely re-
packaging of the same thing, right?
> But this solution is fine with me, and I am one of the few people who
cares about this, so no worries.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14840#comment:56>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
