#20402: Make subword complexes compatible with real reflection groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: reflection group, | Merged in:
coxeter group, subword complex, | Reviewers:
days80 | Work issues:
Authors: Christian Stump | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 52c39d9ef149ee6826cb3f8f06b7aa7582d49f14
Branch: u/stumpc5/20402 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #11187 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by stumpc5):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Hi Travis, I believe I fixed everything you mentioned except for the fact
that I almost completely test using {{{ReflectionGroup}}}'s. In
particular, I fixed a few hacks and {{{todo}}}'s.
The changes to {{{reflection_group_real.py}}} and to
{{{coxeter_group.py}}} are not strictly there to get subword complexes to
work (though the uniformization is done for that reason). Should I extect
those changes into a different ticket, or is everyone okay with having it
here?
Beside that, I set it back to {{{needs review}}}.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20402#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
