#20402: Make subword complexes compatible with real reflection groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: reflection group, | Merged in:
coxeter group, subword complex, | Reviewers:
days80 | Work issues:
Authors: Christian Stump | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 295d784db0ae24bed97ed7b4d3777df9dbd652c2
Branch: u/stumpc5/20402 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #11187 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:49 stumpc5]:
> @Nicolas, do you agree this to be reasonable or do even not like this
usage of the coercion?
When in doubt, I tend to take the path that is easier to change in the
future in case one change one's mind after gaining more experience. In
this case, it's easier to add the coercion later on than to remove it,
or replace it by something else.
But that's no strong opinion. Proceed as you believe is right.
Cheers,
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20402#comment:50>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
