#20526: A benchmarking tool for linear codes
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dlucas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.2
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dlucas/benchmarking_tool | 0ab93ecbf861c585b83bb162493afcaf5a2032c8
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jsrn):
Sounds good! Quick remark (didn't check the code yet): In "A Course In
Error-Correcting Codes" by Justesen and Høholdt then "decoding error" is
defined as the decoder returning a codeword which was not the intended,
and "decoding failure" is defined as the decoder not returning the wanted
codeword (i.e. either returning nothing or returning a wrong one).
That is, `P(failure) >= P(error) and P(failure) - P(error) = P(not
returning anything)`.
Perhaps this implementation should reflect this (non-universally adopted)
convention.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20526#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
