#16897: use pip for some optional/experimental python packages
-------------------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  build              |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by embray):

 #20218 offers a middle ground--it keeps `spkg-install` (in particular
 since at least some packages need a little more work before it can run
 `pip`).  But for most Python packages the sole function of `spkg-install`
 is to cd into its source and run `pip`.

 I think having a proper `spkg-install` script for each package, even if
 it's trivial, is ultimately simpler and less confusing than having
 different build/install paths for different kinds of packages that meet a
 very specific set up conditions.  Better that all packages have an `spkg-
 install` documenting "this is how you install this package", and not
 require a priori knowledge that some arbitrary package happens to be a
 Python module distribution.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16897#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to