#812: add Pollack/Stevens overconvergent modular symbols code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  craigcitro         |        Owner:  mmasdeu
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-feature
      Component:  modular forms      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  p-adic             |    Merged in:
  L-functions                        |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Marc Masdeu,       |  Work issues:
  David Roe                          |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  990f9b804dc653d3b0a2ecf9946dba26584f9481
         Branch:  u/mmasdeu/812      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by wuthrich):

 (I am having issues posting. So I will do it in small portions, sorry)

 Now here to a list of issues that I spotted this morning.

 * I don't think it is a good idea that {{{m =
 E.modular_symbol(implementation="pollack-stevens")}}} gives a completely
 different type of thing back. It is not even callable. Is it even
 desirable to have them in the same function. I would have left
 {{{modular_symbols}}} as before and added a
 {{{overconvergent_modular_symbols}}} as a separate method. (Personally, I
 would revert this function to before and think about it in a next ticket.)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/812#comment:62>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to