#812: add Pollack/Stevens overconvergent modular symbols code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  craigcitro         |        Owner:  mmasdeu
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-feature
      Component:  modular forms      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  p-adic             |    Merged in:
  L-functions                        |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Marc Masdeu,       |  Work issues:
  David Roe                          |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  990f9b804dc653d3b0a2ecf9946dba26584f9481
         Branch:  u/mmasdeu/812      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by wuthrich):

 * The normalisation of the p-adic L-function is wrong. One has to divide
 by the number of real connected components of the elliptic curve. This
 matters for p=2, otherwise it is a choice of normalisation. But it is
 better to be consistent with sage.

 * If we leave {{{E.modular_symbol()}}} as modified here, then it should
 take eclib as default (as stated in the new docstring). Without having
 resolved #10256, {{{ps_modsym_from_elliptic_curve}}} should take eclib for
 positive and sage for negative. Or is sage for both a better choice?
 Certainly much slower. (Again I opt, for keeping as before and use slow
 sage for overconvergent ms by now)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/812#comment:63>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to