#20826: AlgebraicExtensionFunctor should include number field structure
-----------------------------+-------------------------------
   Reporter:  pbruin         |            Owner:
       Type:  defect         |           Status:  new
   Priority:  major          |        Milestone:  sage-7.3
  Component:  number fields  |         Keywords:
  Merged in:                 |          Authors:  Peter Bruin
  Reviewers:                 |  Report Upstream:  N/A
Work issues:                 |           Branch:
     Commit:                 |     Dependencies:
   Stopgaps:                 |
-----------------------------+-------------------------------
 If a number field is equipped with structural morphisms, these are lost
 when applying the functorial construction of the number field (via
 `NumberField.construction()` and `AlgebraicExtensionFunctor`), which
 happens for example in the construction of push-outs:
 {{{
 sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
 sage: K.<a> = NumberField(x^2 - 3)
 sage: L0.<b> = K.change_names()
 sage: L0.structure()
 (Isomorphism given by variable name change map:
    From: Number Field in b with defining polynomial x^2 - 3
    To:   Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 - 3,
  Isomorphism given by variable name change map:
    From: Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 - 3
    To:   Number Field in b with defining polynomial x^2 - 3)
 sage: L1 = (b*x).parent().base_ring()
 sage: L1.structure()
 (Ring Coercion endomorphism of Number Field in b with defining polynomial
 x^2 - 3,
  Ring Coercion endomorphism of Number Field in b with defining polynomial
 x^2 - 3)
 }}}
 This currently does not cause too much trouble because the two fields
 (with and without the structural morphisms) are considered equal, although
 they are not identical:
 {{{
 sage: L1 is L0
 False
 sage: L1 == L0
 True
 }}}
 However, this becomes a nuisance when trying to implement "equality is
 identity" for number fields (to be done on a future ticket).

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20826>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to