#20951: Fix Relative Field Extensions
-------------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: jlavauzelle | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: coding theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Julien Lavauzelle | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+----------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Julien Lavauzelle', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Julien Lavauzelle
* component: PLEASE CHANGE => coding theory
* branch: u/jlavauzelle/fix_relative_field_extensions =>
* type: PLEASE CHANGE => enhancement
Old description:
New description:
This tickets aims at fixing some minors bugs in the experimental class
`RelativeFiniteFieldExtension`.
--
Comment:
Hi,
I fixed ambiguity in the documentation of some functions. I also fixed a
minor bug in the method `relative_field_representation`.
I added a function which basically invert the relative field embedding (I
mean, given an absolute field element `x` which actually lies in the
relative field, the function cast `x` into the relative field).
Didn't check the other methods.
Open for review.
Julien
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20951#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
