#20940: LatticePoset: add is_sectionally_complemented()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/sectionally_complemented|
8f1c6694856986261bf6b7d90622d65079b12e17
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* cc: tscrim (added)
* status: needs_work => needs_info
Comment:
Travis, I reformatted the input-output -blocks like in #20972 (btw, thanks
for review).
But should the certificate be one element, i.e. a tuple of two elements?
It seems kind of unnecessary, but then it would be consistent with
certificate of `is_relatively_complemented()`.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20940#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
