#21033: package type = pip needs documentation
---------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: mkoeppe | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: build | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by jdemeyer:
Old description:
> There are now several packages where `build/pkgs/PACKAGE/type` is "pip".
>
> Is there any documentation on this?
> I tried to add a package of this type for pypolymake (for #20892), but
> adding the file build/pkgs/pypolymake/type does not seem to enable "sage
> -i pypolymake". What am I missing?
>
> Also, shouldn't the way in which a package is installed (traditional way
> vs. pip way)
> be orthogonal to whether a package is considered standard, optional, or
> experimental?
New description:
There are now several packages where `build/pkgs/PACKAGE/type` is "pip".
Is there any documentation on this?
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21033#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
