#13215: Skew polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: caruso | Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.3
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: skew polynomials | Merged in:
Authors: Xavier Caruso | Reviewers: Burcin Erocal
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/arpitdm/skew_polynomials | e189fec13d005a7fba39a429876c501fe95c05da
Dependencies: #13214, #13303, | Stopgaps:
#13640, #13641, #13642 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:73 jsrn]:
> Replying to [comment:69 tscrim]:
> > I'm not asking for perfection. If we do decide to subclass, then it
just makes it somewhat harder to refactor once this is included. Just to
be clear, I am just raising the question, not making the refactoring a
requirement.
>
> I don't think it makes it harder to refactor later on than now: it's
exactly the same work, since the full implementation of skew polynomials
has already been written, doctested etc. That's one reason I would suggest
leaving it for a future ticket.
It just means we have to deal with getting old pickles to work, which
might be non-trivial (granted, Sage is not always successful with this).
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13215#comment:74>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
